While evaluating the websites in the first activity, I found that the information in the first link seems to be inaccurate, and flawed. I personally wouldn't use the website for anything because it doesn't give any contact, and seems to all be made up. There also wasn't an author. On the second website, It sounded more accurate, and reliable. There was contact information, and the facts seemed a lot more studied up. There was an author. The post also has a date of when it was last uploaded, and updated.
While evaluating the websites for the third activity, I found that on the second link was the best link. I think it is the best link because it had information, a date of when it was last post, and seemed very well revised. I wouldn't use the first link because it is lacking information, and doesn't seem very well revised. I wouldn't use the third link because it is on Wiki, and anyone can change the information on Wiki, therefore making the information very unreliable, and could possibly be inaccurate.
No comments:
Post a Comment